===================================
Although we had a multitude of topics to choose from for our blog discussion this week, I chose to discuss the need for health/sex education in our public schools because I firmly, adamantly believe this is just as important as the required core curriculum classes necessary for graduation from high school.
In my opinion, the critical information taught and learned within this classroom setting will only serve in a positive way to educate and teach our youth about sexual health, disease prevention and healthy lifestyles, and this information is invaluable if we are to effectively promote healthy lifestyles to our children, students and families. To eliminate or dilute such sex education programs within our public school systems is a disservice to our youth, and only exemplifies the fact that “funding is more important than function.” I believe it is our responsibility as parents, family members, and educators to insist that our health and sex education programs continue within the public school system, and to become involved in the decision-making process regarding school curriculums.
As a very young child, perhaps age six or seven, I vividly recall having a “sex education” conversation with my mother. As I sat on the edge of the bed while she starched and ironed my school dresses, I remember asking her, “Mommy, how did you get me?” She thought about the question for a few minutes and then very matter-of-factly explained the “birds and bees” to me. That was the one and only sex education conversation I ever had with my mother. But at least I had that. Many children and adolescents have no education, whatsoever, from their parents or family members, and are left to learn on their own --- often with serious consequences.
Much controversy about school-based sex education programs continues to exist, and although the federal government has endorsed Abstinence-Only Until Marriage (AOUM) educational programs, the effectiveness of such programs show little improvement in changing adolescent behavior over comprehensive sexuality educational programs (Alexander, LaRosa, Bader, Garfield and Alexander, 2010).
My opinion is that we should continue comprehensive sex education programs at the junior high and high school levels. This is not meant to condone or promote sexual behavior among our adolescents, but to acknowledge that they will continue to learn and experiment despite what we tell them to do, as in the “Abstinence-Only Until Marriage” method of teaching sex education. As teen pregnancy, incidence of STIs and HIV continue to be a very prevalent issue among our adolescent population, I believe it is our responsibility to educate to the best of our ability, so our children and adolescents have the information necessary to make the best choices.
Carol Martin
References
Alexander, L.L., LaRosa, J.H., Bader, H., Garfield, S., Alexander, W.J. (2010) Dimensions in women’s health. (5th Ed.) Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
